|
Folic
Acid Content of Ready-to-Eat Cereals Determined by Liquid
Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry: Comparison to Product Label
and to Values Determined by Microbiological Assay
Katherine M. Phillips (1,2), David M. Ruggio (1), Mehdi
Ashraf-Khorassani (3), Ronald R. Eitenmiller (4), Sungeun Cho
(4), Linda E. Lemar (5), Charles R. Perry (5), Pamela R.
Pehrsson (5), and Joanne M. Holden (5).
(1) Biochemistry Department
(0308), Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University,
Blacksburg, VA 24061. (2) Corresponding author. Phone: (540)
231-9960. Fax: (540) 231-9070. E-mail: <kmpvpi@vt.edu> (3)
Chemistry Department, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State
University, Blacksburg, VA 24061. (4) Department of Food
Science and Technology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602.
(5) USDA ARS, Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center,
Nutrient Data Laboratory, 10300 Baltimore Blvd., Bldg. 005, Room
107, Beltsville, MD 20705. Cereal Chem. 87(1):42-49. Accepted
July 8, 2009. This article is in the public domain and not
copyrightable. It may be freely reprinted with customary
crediting of the source. AACC International, Inc., 2010.
Abstract: Twelve popular ready-to-eat
breakfast cereals fortified with folic acid were sampled in the
United States in 2006, and the data have been incorporated into
the USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference.
Cereals were collected from three statistically selected retail
outlets in each of four primary census regions, and four
composites of each product were prepared using random groupings
of three locations each. Folic acid was determined using a
validated LC-MS method, with (^13)C-folic acid as an internal
standard, after trienzyme treatment and solid phase extraction.
A cereal reference material (AACC VMA399) was analyzed as a
control. Selected samples were also assayed using the standard
microbiological method, with and without trienzyme extraction,
to generate an estimate of endogenous folate. On average, as
shown on the label, folate content was underestimated. In seven
cereals, folate was within 5% of the declared value; in four
cereals, it was 5–20% higher; and in two cereals, it was >20%
greater, representing –75 to +69 µg/serving (mean 17) of the
label value, equivalent to –19% to +17% of the 400 µg/daily
value. The microbiologically determined folic acid was higher
than LC-MS by 10–67% (mean 40%). Therefore, use of label values
might underestimate folate intake from some breakfast cereals.
|