|
|

|

|
|

|
|
Publication no. C-2003-1216-05R
| VIEW
ARTICLE
High-Speed NIR Segregation of High- and Low-Protein Single
Wheat Seeds.
M. C. Pasikatan (1) and F. E. Dowell (1,2). (1) Postdoctoral
research associate and research leader, respectively,
Engineering Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Grain Marketing and
Production Research Center, 1515 College Avenue, Manhattan, KS
66502. Names are necessary to report factually on available
data; however, the USDA neither guarantees nor warrants the
standard of the product, and the use of the name by the USDA
implies no approval of the product to the exclusion of others
that may also be suitable. (2) Corresponding author. Phone:
785-776-2753. Fax: 785-537-5550. E-mail:
<fdowell@gmprc.ksu.edu> Cereal Chem. 81(1):145-150.
Accepted September 8, 2003. This article is in the public domain
and not copyrightable. It may be freely reprinted with customary
crediting of the source. American Association of Cereal
Chemists, Inc., 2004.
Wheat breeders need a nondestructive method to rapidly sort
high- or low-protein single kernels from samples for their
breeding programs. For this reason, a commercial color sorter
equipped with near-infrared filters was evaluated for its
potential to sort high- and low-protein single wheat kernels.
Hard red winter and hard white wheat cultivars with protein
content >12.5% (classed as high-protein, 12% moisture basis)
or < 11.5% (classed as low-protein) were blended in
proportions of 50:50 and 95:5 (or 5:95) mass. These wheat blends
were sorted using five passes that removed 10% of the mass for
each pass. The bulk protein content of accepted kernels
(accepts) and rejected kernels (rejects) were measured for each
pass. For 50:50 blends, the protein in the first-pass rejects
changed as much as 1%. For the accepts, each pass changed the
protein content of accepts by approximately 0.1%, depending on
wheat blends. At most, two re-sorts of accepts would be required
to move 95:5 blends in the direction of the dominant protein
content. The 95:5 and 50:50 blends approximate the low- and
high-protein mixture range of early generation wheat
populations, and thus the sorter has potential to aid breeders
in purifying samples for developing high- or low-protein wheat.
Results indicate that sorting was partly driven by color and
vitreousness differences between high- and low-protein
fractions. Development of a new background specific for high- or
low-protein and fabrication of better optical filters for
protein might help improve the sorter performance.
|
|
|
|

|
|
|