|
|

|

|
|

|
|
doi:10.1094/CCHEM-84-3-0207
|
VIEW
ARTICLE
Effect of Flour Extraction Rate on White and Red Winter Wheat Flour
Compositions and Tortilla Texture.
Benjamín Ramírez-Wong (1,2), C. E. Walker (3), Ana I. Ledesma-Osuna (1),
Patricia I. Torres (1), Concepción L. Medina-Rodríguez (1), Guadalupe A.
López-Ahumada (1), María G. Salazar-García (1), Refugio Ortega-Ramírez (1), A.
M. Johnson (3), and Rolando A. Flores (4). (1) Departamento de Investigación y
Posgrado en Alimentos, Universidad de Sonora, Hermosillo, Sonora, México. (2)
Corresponding author. Phone: 662-259-2207. Fax: 662-259-2207. E-mail:
<bramirez@guaymas.uson.mx> (3) Department of Grain Science and Industry, Kansas
State University, Manhattan, KS 66506-2201 U.S.A. E-mail: <chuckw@ksu.edu> (4)
Food Science and Technology Department-Food Processing Center, 143 Filly Hall,
University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68588-0919 U.S.A. E-mail: <rflores2@unl.edu>
Cereal Chem. 84(3):207-213. Accepted November 6, 2006. Copyright 2007 AACC
International, Inc.
Wheat flours commercially produced at 74, 80, and 100% extraction rates made
from hard white winter wheat (WWF) and hard red winter wheat (WRF) were used to
produce tortillas at a commercial-scale level. Flour characteristics for
moisture, dry gluten, protein, ash, sedimentation volume, falling number, starch
damage, and particle-size distribution were obtained. Farinograms and alveograms
were also obtained for flour-water dough. A typical northern Mexican formula was
used in the laboratory to test the tortilla-making properties of the flours.
Then commercial-scale tortilla-baking trials were run on each flour. The baked
tortillas were stored at room and refrigeration temperatures for 0, 1, 2, and 3
days. Maximum stress and rollability were measured every day. Tortilla moisture,
color, diameter, weight, and thickness were measured for each treatment.
Finally, tortilla acceptability was tested by an untrained sensory panel.
Analyses of variance (ANOVA) were performed on the data. WWF had higher protein
content, dry gluten, sedimentation volume, and water absorption than the WRF.
The WWF was the strongest flour based on farinograph development time and
alveograph deformation work. It also produced the most extensible dough measured
with the alveograph (P/L). Flour protein and ash contents, water
absorption, and tenacity increased directly with the flour extraction rate. Both
WWF and WRF performed well in commercial-scale baking trials of tortillas.
Tortillas made with both types of flours at 74 and 80% extraction rates had the
best firmness and rollability. However, tortillas made with WWF 80% had the best
color (highest L value). Tortillas prepared with 100% extraction rate
flour were also well accepted by the sensory panel, had good textural
characteristics, and became only slightly firm and slightly less rollable after
three days of storage at room temperature.
|
|
|
|

|
|
|