|
|

|

|
|

|
|
DOI: 10.1094/CC-83-0335
| VIEW
ARTICLE
Wavelength Selection for Classifying Paddy Rice by Near-Infrared
Spectroscopy.
Chang-Chun Liu (1), Jai-Tsung Shaw (1,2), Keen-Yik Poong (1), Mei-Chu Hong
(3), and Ming-Lai Shen (4). (1) PhD candidate, professor, and former research
assistant, respectively. Dept. of Bio-Industrial Mechatronics Engineering,
National Taiwan University. (2) Corresponding author. Phone and fax:
886-2-33665329. E-mail: <m320@ntu.edu.tw> (3) Agronomist, Taichung District
Agricultural Improvement Station. (4) Professor, Dept. of Agronomy, National
Taiwan University. Cereal Chem. 83(4):335-339. Accepted February 6, 2006.
Copyright 2006 AACC International, Inc.
Using five paddy rice cultivars grown in Central, Eastern, and Southern Taiwan
and harvested in the summers of 1997, 1998, and 1999, eight calibrated models
were established by discriminant analysis and backpropagation neural network
with four wavelength selection methods. Randomly adding 80 samples of the 2000
year crop in the three-crop-year calibrated models for annual recalibration,
eight models were used to classify paddy rice harvested in the summer of 2000.
With 351 wavelengths of models 1 and 2, the average classification rates by
discriminant analysis and backpropagation neural network were 98.1 and 92.5%,
respectively. With 69 wavelengths selected by stepwise discrimination of models
3 and 4, the average classification rates by discriminant analysis and
backpropagation neural network were 98.5 and 85.5%, respectively. With 69
wavelengths selected by correlation matrix of models 5 and 6, the average
classification rates by discriminant analysis and neural network were 72.0 and
72.2%, respectively. With 69 wavelengths from loading values in the first and
second principal components of models 7 and 8, the average classification rates
by discriminant analysis and neural network were 69.1 and 60.6%, respectively.
Model 3 would be recommended for classifying paddy rice to set trading prices
because of its highest classification rate (98.5%).
|
|
|
|

|
|
|