|
|

|

|
|

|
|
DOI: 10.1094/CC-83-0300
| VIEW
ARTICLE
Effects of Processing Conditions on Nanoclay Dispersion in Starch-Clay
Nanocomposites.
Bor-Sen Chiou (1,2), Emma Yee (1), Delilah Wood (1), Justin Shey (1), Greg Glenn
(1), and William Orts (1). (1) Bioproduct Chemistry and Engineering, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, ARS, WRRC, 800 Buchanan Street, Albany, CA 94710.
Names are necessary to report factually on available data; however, the USDA
neither guarantees nor warrants the standard of the product, and the use of the
name by the USDA implies no approval of the product to the exclusion of others
that may also be suitable. (2) Corresponding author: Phone: 510-559-5628. Fax:
510-559-5675. E-mail: <bschiou@pw.usda.gov> Cereal Chem. 83(3):300-305. Accepted
March 2, 2006. This article is in the public domain and not copyrightable. It
may be freely reprinted with customary crediting of the source. AACC
International, Inc., 2006.
Wheat starch samples containing Cloisite Na+ and 30B nanoclays were extruded
from a twin-screw extruder. Moisture content, temperature, and screw speed were
varied to determine their effect on nanoclay dispersion. X-ray diffraction and
transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were used to examine nanoclay
intercalation and exfoliation. Moisture content had the largest effect on
Cloisite Na+ dispersion, with the highest moisture sample containing exfoliated
nanoclays. Meanwhile, temperature and screw speed had little effect on Cloisite
Na+ dispersion. For Cloisite 30B samples, only an increase in temperature
produced slight intercalation of nanoclays. This was due to the incompatibility
of starch with the more hydrophobic Cloisite 30B. Also, Cloisite Na+ and 30B
intercalation did not depend on specific mechanical energy. In addition, water
absorbance tests indicated the Cloisite Na+ sample containing the most
well-dispersed nanoclays had the lowest water uptake.
|
|
|
|

|
|
|