|
|

|

|
|

|
|
DOI: 10.1094/CC-83-0099
| VIEW
ARTICLE
Interaction Between Sorghum Protein Extraction and Precipitation Conditions
on Yield, Purity, and Composition of Purified Protein Fractions.
S. R. Bean (1,2), B. P. Ioerger (1), S. H. Park (1), and H. Singh (3). (1)
USDA-ARS, Grain Marketing and Production Research Center, Manhattan, KS 66502.
Names are necessary to report factually on available data; however, the USDA
neither guarantees nor warrants the standard of the product, and the use of the
name by the USDA implies no approval of the product to the exclusion of others
that may also be suitable. (2) Corresponding author. Phone: 785-776-2725. Fax:
785-537-5534. E-mail: <scott.bean@gmprc.ksu.edu> (3) California State University,
Los Angeles, CA, 90032. Cereal Chem. 83(1):99-107. Accepted October 25, 2005.
This article is in the public domain and not copyrightable. It may be freely
reprinted with customary crediting of the source. AACC International, Inc.,
2006.
Sorghum proteins have the potential to be used as a bio-industrial renewable
resource for applications such as biodegradable films and packaging. This
project was designed to evaluate the effect of interactions between sorghum
protein extraction and precipitation conditions on the yield, purity, and
composition of sorghum protein fractions. Proteins were extracted with 70%
ethanol under nonreducing conditions, with ultrasound, or under reducing
conditions using either sodium metabisulfite or glutathione as the reducing
agent. Several conditions were used to isolate the extracted proteins through
precipitation, including lowering ethanol concentrations alone or in combination
with lowering to pH 2.5, or by adding 1M NaCl to the extract.
Combinations of these conditions were also tested. All precipitation conditions
effectively precipitated proteins and lowering the pH and adding 1M NaCl
to the extracts enhanced precipitation in some cases. However, the conditions
that precipitated the maxium amount of protein or highest purity of protein
varied according to how the proteins were initially extracted. Precipitated
proteins were characterized by RP-HPLC, SEC, HPCE, and SDS-PAGE to compare the
protein fractions composition. Nonreduced and sonicated samples had a much wider
M(w) distribution than reduced extracts. Thus, extraction and
precipitation conditions influenced the isolated proteins yield, purity, and
composition. Because the extraction and purification processes influenced the
composition, purity, and biochemical properties, it may be possible to prepare
protein fractions with unique functionalities for specific end-uses.
|
|
|
|

|
|
|