|
|

|

|
|

|
|
DOI: 10.1094/CC-82-0711
| VIEW
ARTICLE
Genotypic and Environmental Effects on Color and Discoloration Potential of
Barley in Food Products.
Z. Quinde-Axtell (1), S. E. Ullrich (2), and B.-K. Baik (2,3). (1) Graduate
research assistant, Department of Food Science & Human Nutrition, Washington
State University, Pullman, WA 99164-6376. (2) Professor and assistant professor,
respectively, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University,
Pullman, WA 99164-6420. (3) Corresponding author. Phone: 509-335-8230. E-mail:
<bbaik@wsu.edu> Cereal Chem. 82(6):711-716. Accepted June 27, 2005. Copyright 2005
AACC International, Inc.
Twelve genotypes of barley, including hulled and hulless
proanthocyanidin-containing and hulled proanthocyanidin-free types, were grown
in five environments (location-year combination) to determine the relative
contribution of genotype and environment on quality traits associated with
discoloration potential of barley. Barley grains were abraded and milled into
flour. Protein, ash, total polyphenol content, and polyphenol oxidase (PPO)
activity were determined. Brightness (L*) of abraded kernels, cooked
kernels, gels, and dough sheets were determined and used as indicators of
discoloration potential. Genetic factors were more important in determining
total polyphenol content, PPO activity, and brightness of dough sheets and as
important as environmental factors for protein and ash content. Across
environments, L* of dough sheets was consistently higher in
proanthocyanidin-free barley (73–76) than in proanthocyanidin-containing
barley (59–70). Total polyphenol content of abraded grains was highest in
barley grown in a dry area at 0.18%, lower in high rainfall areas at 0.13%, and
lowest in irrigated areas at 0.12%. Genotype (G) by environment (E) interactions
were significant for all traits, except for brightness of cooked kernels.
However, the effects of the G × E interactions were generally small compared
with either the genetic or the environmental effect alone and primarily due to
changes in magnitude rather than in rank. Stability analyses confirmed the
nature of the G × E interactions.
|
|
|
|

|
|
|