|
|

|

|
|

|
|
Publication no. C-2004-0310-02R
| VIEW
ARTICLE
Hydration Rates for Various Types of Mexican Maize Based on Single-Kernel
Measurements.
Gonzalo Ramos (1), Marisol Pezet-Valdez (2,3), Aileen O’Connor-Sánchez
(4), Celia Placencia (1), and Reynaldo C. Pless (1,5). (1) Centro de
Investigación en Ciencia Aplicada y Tecnología Avanzada del I.P.N., Unidad
Querétaro, José Siurob 10, Col. Alameda, Querétaro, C.P. 76040, Mexico. (2)
Centro de Investigación en Ciencia Aplicada y Tecnología Avanzada del I.P.N.,
Legaria 694, Mexico, C.P. 11500, Mexico. (3) Present address: Instituto
Politécnico Nacional, Escuela Nacional de Medicina y Homeopatía, Mexico City,
Mexico. (4) CICY – Unidad de Biotecnología, Mérida, Yucatán C.P. 97200,
Mexico. (5) Corresponding author: Phone and Fax: 52-442-2129466. E-mail: <Reynaldo.Pless@cicataqro.ipn.mx> Cereal Chem. 81(3):308-313. Accepted November
30, 2003. Copyright 2004 American Association of Cereal Chemists, Inc.
Hydration kinetics for sound maize kernels in liquid water, determined by
single-kernel measurements for three different Mexican maize types, yielded
water diffusion coefficients ordered as Celaya corn > Toluca corn >
Palomero corn, at all temperatures examined. These diffusion coefficients are
lower than those reported earlier for maize grains, possibly due to the fact
that in the present study damaged kernels were rigorously excluded. The energies
of activation determined from the Arrhenius plots were ordered as Palomero corn
> Celaya corn = Toluca corn and were similar in value to those reported
earlier for other maize types. Damage to the surface of the maize kernels during
the hydration experiments occurs at a significant frequency. Even minor surface
lacerations can strongly affect the rate of hydration of the kernels.
Experiments with maize grains selectively varnished in various parts of their
surface show that the entry of water into the kernels occurs predominantly
through the pericarp, not through the tip cap, though the tip cap has a higher
water inflow per unit area.
|
|
|
|

|
|
|