|
|

|

|
|

|
|
Publication no. C-2003-1010-02R
| VIEW
ARTICLE
Effect of Hydrophilic Gums on Frozen Dough. I. Dough Quality.
R. Sharadanant (2) and K. Khan (2,3). (1) Published with the approval of the
Director, Agricultural Experimental Station, North Dakota State University,
Fargo, ND 58105. (2) Department of Cereal and Food Sciences, Harris Hall, North
Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105. (3) Corresponding author. E-mail:
<Khalil.Khan@ndsu.nodak.edu> Cereal Chem. 80(6):764-772. Accepted May 28, 2003.
Copyright 2003 American Association of Cereal Chemists, Inc.
Disadvantages of frozen doughs are their variable performance and loss of
stability over long-term frozen storage. Changes in rheological properties of
frozen doughs have been reported to be due to the physical damage of the gluten
network caused by ice crystallization and recrystallization. The objective of
this study was to determine the effect of hydrophilic gums on ice
crystallization and recrystallization for improvement of the shelf-life
stability of frozen dough. The present research involved use of the Hard Red
Spring wheat cultivar Grandin and hydrophilic gums such as carboxymethyl
cellulose (CMC), gum arabic, kappa carrageenan (kappa-carrageenan), and locust
bean gum at three different levels each on doughs stored frozen for up to 16
weeks. The dough characteristics were analyzed after day 0, day 1, and after 4,
8, 12, and 16 weeks of frozen storage using data from differential scanning
calorimetry (DSC), water activity, extensigraph, and proof time. The DeltaH
value of freezable water endothermic transitions obtained using DSC increased
with storage time for all treatments. However, addition of different levels of
the four gums lowered the DeltaH value, indicating a decrease in
freezable water. Doughs with locust bean gum gave a higher peak force, measured
using the Kieffer dough extensibility rig of the texture analyzer, and lower
proof time, indicating better retention of baking quality. Maximum resistance to
extension increased upon addition of 1 and 3% CMC; 1 and 3% kappa-carrageenan;
and 1, 2, and 3% locust bean gum as compared with the control. The various
periods of storage or gum treatments did not affect the water activity of the
thawed frozen doughs. Doughs with locust bean gum gave significantly lower proof
time compared with the other treatments and the control. CMC gave the second
lowest values, followed by gum arabic treatment. Addition of kappa-carrageenan
increased the proof time compared with the control. In summary, locust bean gum,
gum arabic, and CMC improved the dough characteristics to varying degrees. kappa-Carrageenan was the only gum that showed a detrimental effect on frozen
dough.
|
|
|
|

|
|
|