|
|

|

|
|

|
|
Publication no. C-2002-1007-04R
| VIEW
ARTICLE
Measurement of Cooked Noodle Stickiness Using a Modified Instrumental Method.
Seung Ju Lee (1,2), Mikyoung Rha (1), Wonbang Koh (1), Woojoon Park (3), Chiho
Lee (4), Young An Kwon (5), and Jae-Kwan Hwang (6). (1) Wheat Foods Research
Laboratory, Department of Food Science and Technology, Dongguk University, 26,
3-ka, Phil-dong, Chung-ku, Seoul 100-715, Korea. (2) Corresponding author.
E-mail: <Lseungju@dongguk.edu> (3) U.S. Wheat Associates Inc., 303 Leema
Building, 146-1, Soosong-dong, Chongro-ku, Seoul 110-140, Korea. (4) Department
of Animal Products Science, Konkuk University, 93-1, Mojin-dong, Kwanjin-ku,
Seoul 143-701, Korea. (5) Department of Food Science and Technology, Woosuk
University, 490 Hujeong-ri, Samrye-eup, Wanju-kun, Chonbuk 565-800, Korea. (6)
Department of Biotechnology, Yonsei University, Seoul 120-749, Korea. Cereal
Chem. 79(6):838-842. Accepted June 28, 2002. Copyright 2002 American Association
of Cereal Chemists, Inc.
Stickiness of cooked noodles, generally defined as a maximum force in tension
after compression, depends on the compression force, contact area, and physical
properties of the noodles. In the conventional method of measuring stickiness,
only compression force was set as a standard, neglecting the other probable
influencing factors. A modified method was developed for measuring contact area
between noodles and a probe, in addition to the compression force. Four
specimens with varying starch contents (0, 30, 60, and 90%) were tested to
evaluate the new method for measuring cooked noodle stickiness. Contact area
calculated from the displacement of probe at the compression condition was not
consistent among the noodle samples. A corrected stickiness and a corrected
compression force were defined as a simple stickiness directly measured for the
contact area and the compression force measured for the contact area,
respectively. This method proved to be a more effective means in differentiating
the stickiness among noodle samples (than using just compression force factors).
The order in the corrected stickiness magnitudes among the noodles was
consistent regardlessof specimen amount used in the measurements, whereas that
of the simple stickiness was inconsistent when different size samples were used.
The corrected compression force estimated from a fixed simple compression force,
which is a true compression stress, varied among the noodles. Accordingly, the
corrected compression force was a more accurate criteria for stickiness
measurements than was the simple compression force, which subjects the specimens
to only differences in compression for stickiness comparison. The corrected
stickiness results showed greater relationship to sensory stickiness and starch
content than the simple stickiness measurement.
|
|
|
|

|
|
|